Holographyforum.org / holowiki.org

Hi everyone, i have a problem with disortion in reflection holograms. When the object extends to the back the parts which are more far away from the film get disorted. The object becomes bigger with distance. IMG_4079.jpg It's hard to see on camera. This happens when i view the hologram by sun and ...

Also, an odd one. I remember being in the audience when this was presented. He created an algorithm that arragned the pits on a CD-R to display a holographic image.

Hi Jody,
I found my papers, or rather, Joy found them. At any rate, I couldn't find any papers relating to eye position and slit sizes.

But I did find a couple that may be of inrterest to you

Hello all :) I would also appreciate any help in bringing this medium closer to my use, whether that be demystification or practical pointers... I don't have the fattest wallet, but I would be very interested in commissioning this type of work from someone, too. Looking forward to hearing back abou...

But reflectivity at 65 deg is barely above 2% - 3%. You should not be getting any significant woodgrain with a reflectivity that low.

If you're getting woodgrain, it suggests that you're at S polarisation, not P. One way to find out is to use a plain glass plate, and have the ref reflect off the glass plate. Start by orienting the glass plate so reflection is at normal incidence, then slowly rotate the glass plate in the plane of ...

I have an issue with a reflection hologram setup in which the angle of the reference beam is quite large: I am using silver halide film, with a TAC base, laminated onto glass. The reference beam angle is 65deg to the plate normal, linearly polarized, p-polarized orientation (ie. to minimize surface...

As I see it, there's a neural net controlling the input angle, which is interesting. I assume the lens is not holographic (it's not easy to create a large angle holographic angle, as I can attest!). Their lens is certainly impressive. But, I'm a bit confused by their statement: "...our couplers...

Yes, essentially it's the same design we've all been using for two decades; in fact, even earlier since some of the designs are similar to the Air Force Heads Up Display (HUD) from the 1980's. The problem is that you do get noise and double imaging, and a narrow field of view; although the narrow fi...

\Maybe Lloyd Huff and his research partner in Dayton OH may have done some such analysis but I haven’t been able to locate any papers of theirs discussing this and they’re not around to ask. Here you go. Sorry the abstract got cut off, but the book is a collection of papers put together and edited ...